Should the President Enforce Obscenity Laws?

Were the next president to do all in his power to ensure that federal obscenity laws are enforced vigorously, three out of four (75%) adult Americans would support the President in this matter, according to a survey commissioned by Morality in Media and conducted by Harris Interactive.

How does this overwhelming majority of popular support compare to the current 19% job approval rating of President Bush, whose administration has not done much to curb illegal obscenity.

The question asked and overall breakdown of responses are as follows:

“During the past 15 years, hardcore pornographic materials have proliferated in the form of videotapes and DVDs sold in sexually oriented and mainstream video stores, films distributed on cable, satellite and hotel TV systems, and still pictures and video disseminated on the Internet. Were the next president to do all in his or constitutional power to ensure that federal obscenity laws are enforced vigorously against commercial distributors of hardcore pornography, would you support or oppose the President in this matter? Would you be strongly (support/oppose) or just somewhat (support/oppose)?”

75%    Total Support
19%    Total Oppose
56%    Strongly support
19%    Somewhat support
8%    Somewhat oppose
11%    Strongly Oppose
7%    Don’t know/Refused

There was support for vigorous enforcement (at least 60%) across all major demographic groups examined, including: Party Identification [Republicans: 85%; Democrats: 77%; Independents: 69%]; Gender [Women, overall: 79%; Men, overall: 70%]; Marital Status [Married: 80%; Single: 67%]; Child Status [Grown children: 81%; Children at home: 76%; No children: 66%]; Age [18-24: 60%; 25-34: 73%; 35-44: 70%; 45-54: 84%; 54-64: 80%; 65 : 80%]; Ethnicity [White: 76%; Black: 77%; Hispanic: 63%]; Region [North East: 72%; Midwest: 75%; South: 80%; West: 69%].

Robert W. Peters, President of Morality in Media, commented:

“Those who defend hardcore pornography, whether in court or in the court of public opinion, point to the proliferation of this material as ‘proof’ either that everyone is viewing it or that people no longer deem it unacceptable. The porn defenders overlook at least four factors.

“First, much if not most pornography is consumed by a relatively small percentage of individuals who are hooked on it; and many addicts hate what they do. Second, just because a person, whether by mistake or deception or out of curiosity or at weak moments, views pornography does not mean he or she approves of it. This is especially true when many pornographers use unscrupulous means to attract viewers. Third, just because an adult thinks it’s OK to look at some pornography does not mean that he or she approves of all of it. Fourth, many individuals who view pornography on the Internet are minors. According to Nielsen/Net Ratings for February 2002, nearly 16% of visitors to “adult” websites were younger than 18; and according to a study conducted for the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children in 2006, the percentage of Internet users ages 10 to 17 who were exposed to unwanted pornography or who went to “X-rated” websites on purpose increased significantly between 2000 and 2005.

“In Hamling v. United States, the Supreme Court also recognized that the mere fact that hardcore pornographic materials are available in the nation or in a community does not “make them witnesses of virtue” or prove that similar materials at issue in a criminal obscenity trial are acceptable under community standards and therefore legal to disseminate.

“It is unfortunate that during the past 15 years so little has been done at the Federal level to curb distribution of obscene materials. During President Clinton’s terms in offices, enforcement of federal obscenity laws was not a Justice Department priority. During President Bush’s terms, his Attorney Generals have talked big but haven’t implemented needed policies to get the job done.
“Hopefully, the next President will take whatever steps are necessary to fight obscenity effectively, knowing that the large majority of adult Americans will support such action.”

1 Response to “Should the President Enforce Obscenity Laws?”


  1. 1 Sherea Apr 13th, 2008 at 8:52 pm

    On August 14, 2006 TheRawStory.com published an article on Christians Addicted to Pornography. “The poll results indicate that 50% of all Christian men and 20% of all Christian women are addicted to pornography,” said Clay Joes, founder and President of Second Glance Ministries who conducted the poll. A 1996 Promise Keepers survey at one of their stadium events revealed that over 50% of the men in attendance were involved with pornography within one week of attending the event. 51% of pastors say cyber-porn is a possible temptation. 37% say it is a current struggle (Christianity Today, Leadership Survey, 12/2001). It is obvious that no one is immuned against the vice grip and clutches of pornography. This is a $100 Billion industry which feeds on the degredation of our society and the addictions of others. The government needs to intervene immediately in order to spare our children from this industry and to help save our nation from further degredation.

    Here are a few stats:
    As of 2003, there were 1.3 million pornographic websites; 260 million pages (N2H2, 2003).

    The total porn industry revenue for 2006: $13.3 billion in the United States; $97 billion worldwide (Internet Filter Review).

    As of December 2005, child pornography was a $3 billion annual industry (internet-filter-review.com).

    Approximately 20% of all Internet pornography involves children (National Center for Mission & Exploited Children).

    47% percent of families said pornography is a problem in their home (Focus on the Family Poll, October 1, 2003).

Leave a Reply






Free The Voice magazine - One Million Voices Worldwide Campaign

breaking curses and controlling powers

Conference