The Liberty Counsel on Tuesday filed its brief before the Virginia Court of Appeals on behalf of Lisa Miller and her six-year-old daughter, Isabella. The brief argues that Virginia law prohibits the enforcement of a child custody order that arose out of a Vermont same-sex civil union.
The story began last year. After the Virginia Supreme Court refused to decide whether the Virginia Marriage Amendment prohibits recognition of the custody order, a Vermont court ruled that its custody order be enforced in favor of Janet Jenkins, a practicing lesbian who is not Isabella’s biological or adoptive mother.
“Virginia sovereignty, the definition of marriage and family, and the lives of Lisa and Isabella Miller are all at stake in this case,” says Mathew D. Staver, Founder of Liberty Counsel and Dean of Liberty University School of Law. “The people of Virginia have plainly spoken in favor of traditional marriage and have rejected same-sex unions. The Virginia courts must now uphold the Constitution.”
Liberty Counsel opposed the enforcement and argued that the Virginia Constitution and state law prohibit both recognition and enforcement of same-sex civil unions. The issue of whether the Virginia Constitution prohibits enforcement of the custody order (as opposed to mere recognition) has never been previously litigated because Jenkins only sought to have it recognized, not enforced, and the Virginia Constitution was amended after the initial litigation began.
Yesterday Rena Lindevaldsen, Special Counsel to Liberty Counsel and Assistant Professor of Law at Liberty University School of Law, argued in Virginia Circuit Court before Judge Prosser for Lisa Miller. Although Prosser stated that he does not believe the Vermont order can be enforced in Virginia, he concluded that it is a question for the appellate courts.
Liberty Counsel’s Tuesday brief in the Virginia Court of Appeals is part of a new round of appeals that squarely raises the impact of the Virginia Constitution, which became effective on January 1, 2007. It asks the court to refuse to enforce the Vermont order, based on U.S. Supreme Court precedent making a legal distinction between recognition and enforcement.
Liberty argues that while the Full Faith and Credit Clause may require registration of the Vermont order, it cannot constitutionally require enforcement. Moreover, the federal Defense of Marriage Act exempts states from even recognizing out-of-state, same-sex unions.
Jennifer LeClaire is the editor of The Voice magazine and author of "Doubtless: Faith that Overcomes the World." You can also visit her online at www.jenniferleclaire.org.





digg this
save to del.icio.us
Technorati
Tweet this story
Tags








